US will defend PH in a South China Sea war? Don’t bet on it

  • Reading time:10 mins read

IN another instance of Philippine media’s boundless faith in the country’s former colonial master, nearly all newspapers the other day banner-headlined US Secretary of State Michael Richard Pompeo’s claim that America will defend the Philippines in case of an armed attack by any country in the South China Sea.

Don’t bet on it. US officials have said that so many times in the past.

But in cases when the Philippines seemed to be on the verge of an armed conflict with China in the South China Sea, and asked the US for assurances of such succor, they either remained silent or “clarified” that they’d have to study the case more closely.

Forget all the legalities of, and the blah-blahs over, the Mutual Defense Treaty (MDT). The US won’t send its carrier battle groups to help our Navy if ever it challenges the Chinese to a fight for one simple reason: Americans know that that would lead to a nuclear war between two superpowers, that would not only kill millions of citizens of both countries, but will result in global economic collapse.

Such American squirming happened in 1995, when Philippine officials thought that an armed clash could occur because of the Chinese building their first installation on Mischief Reef, which the country also claimed. In a Senate hearing, the then foreign affairs secretary said, after his consultations with US officials: “It is a matter of public knowledge…. The Mutual Defense Treaty does not cover the Spratlys…”

But it could be argued that the statement was made in a hypothetical situation. But Philippine officials, including President Aquino 3rd himself, had actually sought US commitment for an actual situation – and were told to go home.

Aquino’s June 8, 2012 meeting with Obama to beg for US intervention. The dour-faced Obama probably thought: ‘What part of ‘No’ doesn’t he understand’?

I am reprinting here a piece I wrote on this subject in August 2018 and which was also published in my book Debunked: Uncovering Hard Truths about EDSA, Martial Law, Marcos, Aquino, with a Special Section on the Duterte Presidency. The piece was entitled “Aquino, Del Rosario begged US to use its military in Scarborough crisis.” Neither Aquino and his officials nor the US has denied anything reported in the article.

2018 column follows
“If not for US leaders’ pragmatism and coolheadedness, President Benigno Aquino 3rd and his foreign secretary, Albert del Rosario, could have dragged the US into a war with China over the South China Sea territorial dispute. This conflict could have even led to a nuclear war between the two superpowers — and all of this, just because Aquino and del Rosario wanted to cover up their bungling of the Scarborough Shoal crisis.

In April 2012, Chinese civilian-government and fishing vessels went to their fishermen’s succor at Scarborough Shoal (Panatag Shoal) when the Philippine Coast Guard and Bureau of Aquatic Resources accosted them for alleged illegal fishing. Aquino ordered to the shoal the Navy’s biggest warship, acquired only a year earlier, the BRP Gregorio del Pilar, to board the fishermen’s vessels to take them in.

That was a big boo-boo. China pounced on Aquino’s blunder by loudly protesting that the Philippines had “militarized” the dispute, and that ‘Philippine warships’ were detaining its helpless fishermen.

Cleverly, China did not respond by sending its own warships, even as several of its modern frigates were on alert standby just over the horizon. It instead undertook a seaborne version of people power by having over 60 Chinese fishermen’s vessels —escorted by some six civilian government vessels — to the shoal.

The Chinese and Filipinos vessels were then locked in a stand-off that lasted for about six weeks from late April to May 2012, with each party aware that whoever blinks, or withdraws from the shoal, will lose it — forever, as it were.”

Begged the US
“Diplomatic sources here and abroad disclosed that Aquino and del Rosario begged the US to intervene in the conflict, by sending US warships to the area in order to send the message to China that it would defend the Philippine vessels if attacked.

Del Rosario and Defense Secretary Voltaire Gazmin rushed to Washington, D.C. on April 30, as the crisis that started on April 10 seemed to go against the Philippines, to meet with US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Defense Secretary Leon Panetta. Del Rosario invoked Clinton’s statements a year earlier, that the US would stand by its 1951 Mutual Defense Treaty, that requires it to defend the Philippines in case of attack by any foreign power on its military forces.

Del Rosario even issued an official statement on May 9, 2012, a few days after his meeting with Clinton, in which he declared that ‘US officials have publicly declared four times that it would honor the 1951 Mutual Defense Treaty, that obliges American troops to help defend the Philippines if it comes under attack.’

The US embassy in reaction to del Rosario’s claim, issued a statement saying that Clinton in their meeting did say that ‘the United States reaffirms our commitments and obligations under the Mutual Defense Treaty.’ Clinton, however, in several statements instead emphasized, that the ‘US does not take a position in territorial disputes between two countries.’

Clinton and even the US defense secretary did not respond to del Rosario’s demand for a categorical US commitment, that it would come to the Philippines’ defense in case a shooting war breaks out in the Scarborough crisis.

We were blissfully oblivious of the Scarborough stand-off when it was happening, with the Yellow newspapers here successfully toning down the crisis, helped by the fact that the burning issue of the day was Aquino’s project to take down Chief Justice Renato Corona.

Aquino’s mishandling of the Scarborough crisis — reported in China as his deployment of ‘Philippine warships’ against helpless Chinese fishermen — had stoked Chinese nationalist sentiment. ‘The leadership of the Communist Party of China would have even fallen if they appeared to be soft on the Philippines,’ a diplomat said.

The Chinese of course got wind of del Rosario’s pleading for US military intervention, and escalated its rhetoric.”

Belligerent editorials
“As has been its practice of sending its messages to the world, ‘editorials’ in China’s state-run newspapers were practically calling for war against the Philippines over Scarborough. On April 22, 2012, the editorial of state-owned Global Times urged the Chinese government to engage the Philippines in a small-scale war to end the stalemate once and for all. It stated that ‘once war erupts, China must take resolute action and deliver a clear message to the outside world that it does not want a war, but definitely has no fear of it.’

On May 9, the People’s Liberation Army Daily ran a toughly worded editorial saying that China would not tolerate any violation of Chinese sovereignty on Scarborough Shoal. According to the editorial, ‘Not only will the Chinese government not agree, nor will the Chinese people, and the Chinese Army will disagree even more.’ The flurry of threatening editorials from the PLA newspaper underscored its well-known hardline stance when it comes to territorial disputes.

Unreported in the country were media reports from Taiwan and Japan, that alleged that China’s South Sea Fleet had forward-deployed a landing ship flotilla and a naval task force consisting of destroyers and amphibious ships in waters off the Philippines. There were also reports that China had already ordered two submarines to stand by at international waters off Scarborough Shoal.

US officials, however, rebuffed del Rosario and Gazmin’s pleadings. Clinton and Panetta were worried that the two Philippine officials kept pressing them to give a categorical answer to their question: Will the US military come to the Philippines’ rescue if one of their vessels is attacked by the Chinese?

That worried the US that Aquino might order his vessels to provoke the Chinese at Scarborough Shoal, in order to get the Americans into the fray, which could have thrown the situation completely out of control, to lead into a full-blown war between two nuclear powers.

That concern bolsters a report that it was the US that hoodwinked del Rosario and Aquino into believing that there was an agreement brokered by the Americans for the Chinese,to simultaneously withdraw with the Filipino vessels from Scarborough’s lagoon.

There wasn’t an agreement, but merely a proposal for such, and del Rosario naively ordered our vessels out of Scarborough on June 3.”

Aquino meets Obama
“When del Rosario realized the colossal blunder he made when he ordered the Philippine ships to leave the lagoon, which practically turned over Scarborough to the Chinese, he asked Aquino to requested an urgent meeting with then President Barack Obama for a last-resort move to convince the Americans to intervene. Obama reportedly told Aquino in so many words in their meeting on June 8: ‘We can’t and won’t go to war over this. Just file a case in court, and we’ll help you.’

Aquino of course obeyed Obama. His government filed an arbitration suit invoking the Law of the Sea treaty at the Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague, with a Washington D.C. firm Foley Hoag LLP, and a special team of American lawyers recommended by the State Department, handling everything. The work of then Solicitor General Florin Hilbay and his staff was limited to photocopying the US lawyers’ documents.

The US cleverly took advantage of the crisis to advance their interest. In the long discussions with their US counterparts in which del Rosario and Gazmin begged for US military intervention, US Defense Secretary Panetta pointed out that even if the US intervenes militarily, the logistical problem is that with the closure of US military bases in the country in 1991, the American military would find it difficult to supply its ships in the South China Sea.

The US officials in effect told Aquino and his officials: ‘Next time you come running to us begging for our help, you should find a way for our troops to have a logistical base in your country.’

After that, Aquino rushed the passing of the so-called ‘Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement,’ that allows the US to rotate troops into the country for extended stays and to operate facilities, and stock up war materiel on Philippine military bases. That was one of the most important of his priority bills that Aquino asked Congress to enact.”


Facebook: Rigoberto Tiglao
Twitter: @bobitiglao

This Post Has One Comment

  1. Arisia Matchka

    While I understand the doubts some people have, I firmly believe that the US will stand by us. However, that said, it’s important to keep in mind that the US will NOT START WORLD WAR III to protect us! Any dealings with either Russian or China have to be extremely diplomatic in nature.

    The second thing to consider is this. OBAMA DID NOT REPRESENT THE ATTITUDE OF THE USA WHILE HE WAS THE PRESIDENT! Obama had his own agenda which was, usually, SEPARATE FROM THAT THE US.

    Even worse, from the time Hillary Clinton entered their last Presidential race, Obama acted like he was unstoppable. He seemed to feel that Hillary had his back and would support anything he did.

    This was a very stupid assumption on his part because Hillary Clinton had no use for Obama. To her, Obama was the ONLY REASON SHE DIDN’T BECOME PRESIDENT IN 2008!

    All the nonsense we went through because of Obama, and his lackey, former US Ambassador Goldberg was not sanctioned by the US. Instead, the actions were solely those of Obama and Goldberg. To put things into a better perspective, Goldberg’s actions here were a repeat of a previous situation.

    Six years earlier in 2010, Goldberg was the Ambassador to Bolivia. While there, he did exactly the same things he did here. He secretly met with their opposition party and tried to convince them to stage a coup, SIMPLY BECAUSE HE DIDN’T LIKE THEIR PRESIDENT!

    The Bolivian President found out, and told the US State Department he had declared Goldberg persona non grata and he DEMANDED Goldberg’s recall. They removed Goldberg immediately.

    However, when Goldberg attempted the exact same actions here, and was discovered by our President, OBAMA REFUSED TO REMOVE GOLDBERG!

    Finally, Goldberg was removed, and Obama’s term was up. Now the US has a new President, Donald Trump. President Trump supports and respects the Philippines as well as OUR President. In fact, both Duterte and Trump are friends, and, in every situation, Trump has supported us.

    I believe it is premature to believe that the US will not honor it’s treaties with us. As long as Trump is President, short of starting WWIII, I believe he has our back! Of course, who knows who their next President will be and what his/her feelings will be.

    As long as it’s not Hillary Clinton, I believe we can still count on the US. However, based on her words during her failed Presidential campaign, if she ever becomes President of the US, the entire continent of Asia will be in trouble, not just us!

Comments are closed.