Hypocrites: US rejects not just Unclos but also ICC
IT is kind of hilarious that while the little brown Americans in President Marcos, Jr.’s administration keep echoing the American propaganda line that China has been violating the “rules-based international order,” the US repudiates both the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (Unclos) and the International Criminal Court (ICC) — the two institutions that are among the pillars of the so-called “rule-based international order.”
China was among the first countries that, together with us, signed the Unclos in 1982, although it claimed that the compulsory arbitration in 2013 between the Philippines and China not only violates the treaty’s scope (which is solely over maritime rights and not sovereignty claims). It claimed that Unclos also requires contending countries to first seek for voluntary negotiations to attempt to settle competing claims – which the Philippines did not.
On the other hand, China is among the 42 countries in the world – representing 60 percent of humanity – which like the US rejected the ICC on the ground that it intrudes on their sovereignty, a main part of which is their exclusive right to try their citizens accused of committing crimes on their own soil.
The US had even moved to protect itself from the ICC’s reach, and signed agreements with a number of ICC member countries to exclude the US from any of the court’s investigations and trials.
By contrast, I cannot understand why legislators like Edsel Lagman, Risa Hontiveros, and left-wing party-list representatives want to give up a major part of our sovereignty – the sole power of our judiciary to try Filipinos – for their revenge project against former President Rodrigo Duterte. Isn’t that too much?
(more…)