Aquino III lost Scarborough in 2012; Marcos likely to lose Escoda now
UNREPORTED both by our government and that of China is the fact that there is an ongoing standoff at Escoda (Sabina) Shoal between the coast guard vessels of the two countries, each insisting that its nation owns the area, with their presence there indicating their determination to hold on to their claims.
The “collision” last week between China Coast Guard (CCG) and Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) vessels were in fact actions by the Chinese to resolve the standoff by attempting to drive away two other Philippine vessels that arrived in the shoal to support the BRP Teresa Magbanua, which had been there for four months already.
The PCG’s newest and one of its biggest vessels, the Magbanua has been in the shoal for that unusually long period, in order, according to a PCG statement, to protect the country’s sovereign rights in its exclusive economic zone (EEZ).
The Magbanua entered Escoda Shoal in mid-April 2024 and has been there to this day. In response, the CCG sent one of its largest vessels, one with bow number 9701, to the shoal on July 3, anchored just 600 yards from the Philippine vessel. China claimed that the shoal (which it calls Xianbin Jiao) is its sovereign territory, part of its outlying archipelago it calls Nansha Qundao, and asked the Magbanua to leave, which, of course, it refused to do so.
The Philippine government appears to have been planning to repeat its “BRP Sierra Madre” tactic, that is, for the Magbanua to anchor in the shoal permanently, either on a rotational basis, or through regular resupplying by support vessels, to mark its sovereignty. The Chinese 9701 was intended to pressure the Magbanua to leave the shoal.
(more…)



